Speaker summary
⁠63%3 analyzed articles/videos285 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Cashman results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 41% saturation with 122.521 hits. Analysis detected 371.512 faulty-reasoning hits from 285 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (29,800 of 44,411 speakers). This Brian Cashman is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Brian Cashman
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠33%Brian Cashman (selected)20%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 285
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510032.9% percentile
19.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos285 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 41.0%41.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 20.7%20.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 41.0%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos