Speaker summary
72%2 analyzed articles/videos287.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benjamin Hudson results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, False Dilemma, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 111 hits. Analysis detected 870.149 faulty-reasoning hits from 287.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.1% and a BS Rank of 18% (33,319 of 40,321 speakers). This Benjamin Hudson is better (less manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group.
Benjamin Hudson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
18%Benjamin Hudson (selected)13%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 287.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510017.4% percentile
12.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos287.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 13.5%13.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 19.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 8.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Tu Quoque: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate