Author summary
67%4 analyzed articles/videos1,430 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brandon Caldwell results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 691 hits. Analysis detected 4,826 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,149 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 58% (3,679 of 8,706 authors). This Brandon Caldwell is worse (more manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
Brandon Caldwell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
58%Brandon Caldwell (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,149
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

58% percentile
025507510057.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.2%11.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate