theGrio56%

GiveSendGo fundraiser of ‘targeted’ friends of Nolan Wells raises over $100K, blame ‘race baiters’ for upending their lives 63%

By Brandon Caldwell67%

8/3/2026, 7:18:18 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Indoctrination, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.6% saturation with 155 hits. Analysis detected 1,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 490 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.5% and a BS Rank of 63% (9,966 of 26,881 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 62.90% of the article peer group.

Nearly one month after Wells first disappeared following a boat party on July 4 weekend and was later found deceased, the conversation around his case continues to move further and further from learning what happened to him. 
A fundraiser established to raise potential legal funds for some of the friends who were with Nolan Wells when he disappeared on July 4 has garnered more than $100,000 in donations, all aimed to help the teens who some feel have been ostracized from being able to mourn Wells. 
The GiveSendGo, established by Dr. 
Benjamin Hudson, the father of Warren Hudson, outlines the reasoning, specifically calling out Attorney Ben Crump, Rev. 
Al Sharpton, and “local provocateurs continue to invent and spread false narratives and lies with no accountability.” 
According to Hudson, the fundraiser was established to serve two goals: to raise money to defend those friends of Nolan against “wrongful death actions filed by Attorney Ben Crump and his team.” 
The second goal is to fund a “robust legal team to sue for the litany of slander and libel being spread by not only Crump, but also many social media influencers, news outlets, and local provocatuers [sic] who know better.” 
He concluded his post writing, “If you believe in truth, due process, and holding people accountable through the rule of law and not through internet mobs; we ask for your support.” 
Hudson previously offered up to $50,000 for information regarding Wells’ disappearance, as reported by the Sun Herald and TMZ . 
“We don’t know what happened,” Hudson said. 
“We have been completely transparent from the beginning because we want to know what happened, too.” 
Hudson said that his family has received thousands of death threats since Wells’ body was discovered off the northwest tip of Horn Island two days after he disappeared. 
Since Wells’ disappearance has become a national story, the Hudson family and the friends connected to Wells aren’t the only ones who’ve received threats and been slandered online. 
Christine Wonsley, Nolan’s mother, has been vocal about her treatment online as she continues to navigate the unimaginable “normal” of life without her son. 
Wonsley has subpoenaed social media companies Meta and TikTok for answers surrounding her son’s final moments online. 
On Facebook, Wonsley once more defended her and her family’s advocacy for learning the truth about her son and their desire to see a “fair, honest and transparent investigation.” 
“If ADVOCATING for our deceased child to have a fair, honest and transparent investigation while asking local authorities to treat his case as if it were their own makes you feel some type of way please UNFRIEND and BLOCK me because this is MY SOCIAL MEDIA PAGE,” she wrote on Facebook Sunday. 
“We are not asking for special treatment. 
We just want the TRUTH! 
His father and I WILL NOT STOP SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH!” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.9%Brandon Caldwell: 3.6%theGrio: 2.6%Confirmation Bias16.9%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 19.0%Brandon Caldwell: 3.4%theGrio: 2.6%Availability Heuristic19.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.2%theGrio: 0.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 17.1%Brandon Caldwell: 11.2%theGrio: 8.2%Framing Effect17.1%This article: 8.6%Brandon Caldwell: 0.7%theGrio: 0.5%Loss Aversion8.6%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.6%theGrio: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.2%Brandon Caldwell: 0.8%theGrio: 1.3%Optimism Bias2.2%This article: 4.9%Brandon Caldwell: 0.8%theGrio: 0.7%Pessimism Bias4.9%This article: 31.6%Brandon Caldwell: 8.2%theGrio: 9.6%Negativity Bias31.6%This article: 13.3%Brandon Caldwell: 2.9%theGrio: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias13.3%This article: 10.0%Brandon Caldwell: 2.4%theGrio: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error10.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 18.8%Brandon Caldwell: 3.8%theGrio: 1.9%In-Group Bias18.8%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.4%theGrio: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 1.4%theGrio: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.1%Brandon Caldwell: 1.2%theGrio: 0.5%Recency Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Brandon Caldwell: 2.1%theGrio: 0.9%Ad Hominem7.1%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.5%Brandon Caldwell: 0.7%theGrio: 1.8%Appeal to Authority3.5%This article: 6.3%Brandon Caldwell: 2.9%theGrio: 0.9%False Dilemma6.3%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.5%theGrio: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 23.9%Brandon Caldwell: 5.7%theGrio: 3.5%Hasty Generalization23.9%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.7%theGrio: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 18.0%Brandon Caldwell: 8.5%theGrio: 6.0%Appeal to Emotion18.0%This article: 7.6%Brandon Caldwell: 1.5%theGrio: 0.7%Begging the Question7.6%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 8.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.6%theGrio: 0.6%Burden of Proof8.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.1%theGrio: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 1.1%theGrio: 0.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 1.4%theGrio: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 12.0%Brandon Caldwell: 2.1%theGrio: 2.7%Biased Writer Voice12.0%This article: 19.2%Brandon Caldwell: 4.4%theGrio: 1.4%Indoctrination19.2%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 4.1%theGrio: 3.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brandon Caldwell: 0.0%theGrio: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Brandon Caldwell: 0.3%theGrio: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.5%

490 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers68%attributed speech157writer words
Selected voice

Benjamin Hudson

100%flagged-word coverage
188 attributed words56% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Indoctrination+16.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Benjamin Hudson: 16.5%16.5%Biased Writer Voice-2.4 ptsWriter: 11.5%Benjamin Hudson: 9.0%9.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +9.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Benjamin Hudson: 9.0%9.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.