Speaker summary
72%1 analyzed article/video64 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Barry Jesinoski results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Quote-first Misdirection, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 52.1% saturation with 37.5 hits. Analysis detected 114.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 64 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (17,258 of 45,122 speakers). This Barry Jesinoski is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Barry Jesinoski
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
62%Barry Jesinoski (selected)42%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 64
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.8% percentile
41.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos64 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 52.1%52.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 45.8%45.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 40.6%40.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 27.1%27.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 52.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 45.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 40.6%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 0.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos