Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video464 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Kjellman results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Sunk Cost Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 129.362 hits. Analysis detected 463.802 faulty-reasoning hits from 464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (38,202 of 41,036 speakers). This Andrew Kjellman is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
Andrew Kjellman
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠7%Andrew Kjellman (selected)8%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 464
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.9% percentile
7.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos464 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 4.7%4.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos