Author summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video393 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mick Akers results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 493 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,179 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (2,132 of 5,741 authors). This Mick Akers is worse (more manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
Mick Akers
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠63%Mick Akers (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,179
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Mick Akers attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Mick Akers vs sitewide
Mick Akers attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos