Speaker summary
65%1 analyzed article/video136.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alan Graves results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 36.6% saturation with 49.041 hits. Analysis detected 160.322 faulty-reasoning hits from 136.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20% and a BS Rank of 34% (29,794 of 45,120 speakers). This Alan Graves is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Alan Graves
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
34%Alan Graves (selected)20%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 136.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510034.0% percentile
20.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos136.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 36.6%36.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 22.3%22.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.4%6.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 20.5%20.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Speaker 36.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 11.1%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos