Speaker summary
51% 6 analyzed articles/videos 319.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adrian Garcia results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Self-Serving Bias , and False Dilemma , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 81 hits . Analysis detected 486.886 faulty-reasoning hits from 319.333 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (42,075 of 45,128 speakers). This Adrian Garcia is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group. Adrian Garcia
Speaker details
Total words: 319.333
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.8% percentile 7.1% BS Score6 analyzed videos319.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 15.8% 15.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 11.7% 11.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst