Author summary
53% 1 analyzed article/video 424 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Lomax V results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 172 hits . Analysis detected 927 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,696 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 65% (3,376 of 9,464 authors). This John Lomax V is worse (more manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group. John Lomax V
Author details
Total words: 1,696
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.3% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.1% 10.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.4% 4.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Special Pleading: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst