Keyword summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video1,011 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S National Security results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 546 hits. Analysis detected 3,652 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (26,450 of 59,306 keywords). This U S National Security is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
U S National Security
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠56%U S National Security (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,044
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

55% percentile
025507510055.4% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.5%13.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos