Publication summary
61% 8 analyzed articles/videos 5,824 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jewish Insider results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 2,460 hits . Analysis detected 18,799 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,460 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 41% (342 of 570 publications). This Jewish Insider is better (less manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 31,460
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.1% percentile 1.2% BS Score8 analyzed articles31.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst