Author summary
76% 1 analyzed article/video 397 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Kraushaar results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and False Dilemma , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 315 hits . Analysis detected 1,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 89% (1,076 of 9,074 authors). This Josh Kraushaar is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group. Josh Kraushaar
Author details
Total words: 1,588
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.2% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 10.1% 10.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.7% 14.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.4% 5.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 7.0% 7.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 19.8% 19.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 19.8%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.3%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.7%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Author 10.1%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 3.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Middle Ground: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Burden of Proof: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst