Author summary
1% 2 analyzed articles/videos 19,011 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Heideman results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 1.3% saturation with 539 hits . Analysis detected 5,116 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,990 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.4% and a BS Rank of 1% (9,181 of 9,195 authors). This Paul Heideman is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group. Paul Heideman
Author details
Total words: 41,990
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.2% percentile 0.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles42K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst