Keyword summary
6%1 analyzed article/video468 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fort Sam Houston results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 261 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 46% (27,656 of 51,173 keywords). This Fort Sam Houston is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Fort Sam Houston
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Fort Sam Houston attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Fort Sam Houston vs sitewide
Fort Sam Houston attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.