Keyword summary
5%1 analyzed article/video1,174 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Discussing Fauci results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Overconfidence Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 3.3% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 506 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,522 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 10% (45,310 of 50,223 keywords). This Discussing Fauci is better (less manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group.
Discussing Fauci
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Discussing Fauci attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Discussing Fauci vs sitewide
Discussing Fauci attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.