Author summary
⁠4%1 analyzed article/video1,174 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kayla Epstein results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Overconfidence Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 3.3% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 506 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,522 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (7,240 of 8,366 authors). This Kayla Epstein is better (less manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
Kayla Epstein
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠14%Kayla Epstein (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,522
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Kayla Epstein attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Kayla Epstein vs sitewide
Kayla Epstein attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos