Author summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video419 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tara Watson results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 194 hits. Analysis detected 999 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,257 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (1,011 of 6,629 authors). This Tara Watson is worse (more manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group.
Tara Watson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠85%Tara Watson (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,257
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Tara Watson attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Tara Watson vs sitewide
Tara Watson attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos