Author summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video71 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pete Mangione results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 37.6% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 313 faulty-reasoning hits from 213 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (91 of 6,360 authors). This Pete Mangione is worse (more manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group.
Pete Mangione
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠99%Pete Mangione (selected)19%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 213
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Pete Mangione attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Pete Mangione vs sitewide
Pete Mangione attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos