Author summary
40%1 analyzed article/video397 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ken Mahan results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 177 hits. Analysis detected 455 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,191 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,116 of 5,830 authors). This Ken Mahan is worse (more manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group.
Ken Mahan
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Ken Mahan attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Ken Mahan vs sitewide
Ken Mahan attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.