Author summary
22%1 analyzed article/video579 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Tuohy results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 211 hits. Analysis detected 1,026 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 72% (2,586 of 9,103 authors). This Dan Tuohy is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Dan Tuohy
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
72%Dan Tuohy (selected)4%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,316
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

72% percentile
025507510071.6% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 9.1%9.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 3.8%3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.8%1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 1.8%1.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos