At St. Andrew’s by-the-Sea, a celebration of 150 years of service, song and salt air 24%

By Dan Tuohy22%

8/5/2026, 10:11:24 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 499 faulty-reasoning hits from 579 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29.7% and a BS Rank of 24% (22,542 of 29,339 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the article peer group.

The historic chapel of St. 
Andrew’s-by-the-Sea in Rye Beach, which held its first service exactly 150 years ago this month, is a visual feast  both inside and out. 
The inside, with its great wooden trusses, is designed to look like a boat built upside down. 
The outside is postcard perfect, a living time capsule, with arched brick windows and rough-hewn stone walls. 
There's are Tiffany stained glass, tributes to poet Ogden Nash, and a rare “lych gate”  or roofed gateway  at the chapel’s entrance. 
While the Episcopal summer chapel is open to people of any faith, St. 
Andrew’s doors will be wide open this Saturday as they throw <u>a 150th celebration</u>. 
There will be tours of the chapel and grounds, discussion of the architecture and famous visitors, a concert by the Portsmouth Brass Quintet, a food truck serving Texas-style barbecue, and a historic Concord Coach on loan from the <u>Abbot-Downing Historical Society</u>. 
It is a time to celebrate, and to reflect, said Gary Fincke, a senior warden who has attended services at <u>St. 
Andrew’s-by-the-Sea</u> for about three decades. 
“It really is a special place right here by the ocean with a lot of history and a lot of care,” he said, “over 150 years of people who really valued this and have really have kept it and maintained it and made sure that it continues to flourish  not only for us now, but for future generations.” 
The chapel is in the Gothic Revival style, inspired by English country parish churches. 
It is typically open from the middle of June through Labor Day weekend. 
“But we do have baptisms and we have funerals here, and we have weddings,” Fincke said after a Sunday service last month. 
“And so that can also extend either into the fall or as early as in May. . . . 
We really make it available to people whenever it might be of service to them.” 
A stained glass window at St. 
Andrew's by-the-Sea crafted in 1909 to honor Richard Hoffman, an internationally acclaimed pianist from England who served as an organist and choirmaster for the chapel. 
The window emits a warm glow with morning sunlight and can be seen from the brick walkway and lych gate  a traditional roofed gateway, the use of which dates back to medieval times. 
A lych gate’s historical purpose was to shelter a coffin and the funeral bearers awaiting a burial, and otherwise demarcate the entrance to a churchyard. 
The newest improvement on the grounds is a pavilion to support receptions and gatherings after services or events. 
“That actually gives us a space for our hospitality after church Sundays, where people can come and gather,” Fincke said. 
“We've had tents here before and challenges with that. 
So now we have a permanent structure, which is also very helpful for weddings and for baptisms and inclement weather, where they have a place to meet just before coming into the church, which oftentimes, especially with weddings, that's particularly helpful.” 
A few minutes after Fincke was speaking about weddings, a couple that got married at the chapel about 15 years ago happened to walk in the door. 
Cindy and John Conrad of Dover said they come back to the chapel every year on their anniversary. 
And they bring their kids. 
“It was wonderful,” John said when asked about their ceremony. 
“Magical,” Cindy said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Dan Tuohy: 1.2%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.4%Availability Heuristic4.7%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Dan Tuohy: 2.2%New Hampshire Public Radio: 3.5%Framing Effect2.4%This article: 7.1%Dan Tuohy: 1.8%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.8%Loss Aversion7.1%This article: 2.6%Dan Tuohy: 0.6%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.6%Status Quo Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.9%Dan Tuohy: 5.5%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.8%Optimism Bias11.9%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 4.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%Dan Tuohy: 2.5%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias10.2%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 9.1%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Dan Tuohy: 6.9%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.4%Halo Effect9.3%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.5%Dan Tuohy: 3.6%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.2%Appeal to Authority14.5%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 2.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.1%Dan Tuohy: 1.8%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.1%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.9%Dan Tuohy: 2.9%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.0%Anecdotal6.9%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 3.8%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 2.4%Dan Tuohy: 0.6%New Hampshire Public Radio: 1.0%Indoctrination2.4%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Tuohy: 0.0%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Dan Tuohy: 1.8%New Hampshire Public Radio: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.1%

579 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers43%attributed speech332writer words
Selected voice

John Conrad

100%flagged-word coverage
10 attributed words4.0% of attributed speech48% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -12.3 ptsWriter: 12.3%John Conrad: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%John Conrad: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.