Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video1,273 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Monitoring results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 185 hits. Analysis detected 325 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,819 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ā 6% (15,593 of 16,562 topics). This Wildlife Monitoring is better (less manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group.
Wildlife Monitoring
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 6%Wildlife Monitoring (selected)2%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,819
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Wildlife Monitoring attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Wildlife Monitoring vs sitewide
Wildlife Monitoring attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos