Topic summary
⁠15%1 analyzed article/video593 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vision Zero results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 629 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,779 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,715 of 16,562 topics). This Vision Zero is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Vision Zero
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠36%Vision Zero (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,779
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Vision Zero attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Vision Zero vs sitewide
Vision Zero attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos