BS Summary: These Andrea Perdomo-Hernandez results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 112 faulty-reasoning hits from 866 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 4,714 authors). This Andrea Perdomo-Hernandez is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Andrea Perdomo-Hernandez
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Andrea Perdomo-Hernandez attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Andrea Perdomo-Hernandez vs All Other Publications
Andrea Perdomo-Hernandez attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.