Topic summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video382 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Running Events results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 233 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (14,844 of 22,118 topics). This Running Events is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Running Events
Topic details
Total words: 1,528
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.2%2.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 5.1%5.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 1.6%1.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos