Topic summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video409 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Recruit results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.1% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 277 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (20,491 of 24,545 topics). This Recruit is better (less manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group.
Recruit
Topic details
Total words: 1,636
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510016.5% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos