Topic summary
⁠2%1 analyzed article/video611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prize Winners results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 111 hits. Analysis detected 230 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (19,032 of 24,545 topics). This Prize Winners is better (less manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group.
Prize Winners
Topic details
Total words: 2,444
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510022.5% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos