Powerball winning numbers last night, Aug. 5. Ohio ticket hits $1M jackpot 3%

By Cheryl Vari2%

8/6/2026, 3:04:26 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 208 faulty-reasoning hits from 611 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 3% (29,821 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the article peer group.

Did anyone win Wednesday night's Powerball drawing for the jackpot of $794 million? 
The cash option for the Aug. 5 jackpot was $345.2 million. 
Here's what we know about the drawing on Wednesday, Aug. 
5: 
Powerball winning numbers for Aug. 5 lottery drawing jackpot 
The winning numbers for the Aug. 5 drawing were 14, 20, 59, 60, 61. 
The red Powerball was 25, and the Power Play was 2X. 
Did anyone win Powerball? 
No one won the jackpot in the Aug. 5 drawing. 
There was one $1 million Match 5 winner in Ohio. 
There was no Match 5 plus Power Play $2 million prize winner. 
When is the next Powerball drawing? 
The next drawing is on Saturday, Aug. 
8. 
What is the Powerball jackpot up to? 
The jackpot for the next drawing is an estimated $856 million with a cash value of $372.0 million. 
What time is the Powerball drawing? 
Powerball drawings take place at 11 p.m. 
ET every Monday, Wednesday and Saturday. 
See Powerball and Mega Millions winners who hit the jackpot 
Meet lucky Powerball and Mega Millions players who hit the jackpot with winning numbers. 
Key Points 
No one won the $794 million Powerball jackpot in the Wednesday, Aug. 5 drawing. 
The winning numbers for the Aug. 5 drawing were 14, 20, 59, 60, 61, and the Powerball was 25. 
One ticket sold in Ohio matched five numbers to win a $1 million prize. 
The jackpot for the next drawing on Saturday, Aug. 8, has grown to an estimated $856 million. 
You can purchase tickets at gas stations, convenience stores and supermarkets in Ohio, Kentucky and Indiana. 
Sales cut-off times vary by one to two hours before the drawing, depending on the selling jurisdiction. 
Can you buy Powerball tickets online? 
In Kentucky, you can purchase tickets online through the Kentucky Lottery website, kylottery.com. 
In Ohio and Indiana, people can order Powerball tickets online through Jackpocket, the official digital lottery courier of the USA TODAY Network. 
Lottery tickets are sold to residents online through their lottery's official site in the following jurisdictions: 
Kentucky 
Connecticut 
Georgia 
Illinois 
Kansas 
Michigan 
New Hampshire 
North Carolina 
North Dakota 
Pennsylvania 
Virginia 
West Virginia 
Washington, DC 
How much is a Powerball lottery ticket today? 
A single Powerball ticket costs $2. 
Pay an additional $1 to add the Power Play for a chance to multiply all Powerball winnings except for the jackpot. 
In Kentucky, Indiana and some other states, players can also add the Double Play for an additional $1 to have a second chance at winning $10 million. 
How to play Powerball 
To play, select five numbers from 1 to 69 for the white balls, then select one number from 1 to 26 for the red Powerball. 
Powerball Double Play winning numbers for Aug. 
5 
The Double Play winning numbers for the Aug. 5 drawing were 6, 33, 54, 63, 66. 
The red Powerball was 18. 
You can choose your lucky numbers on a play slip or let the lottery terminal randomly pick your numbers. 
How to win Powerball 
Match all 5 white balls + Powerball: Jackpot (odds 1 in 292.2 million) 
Match all 5 white balls: $1 million (odds 1 in 11.7 million) 
Match 4 white balls + Powerball: $50,000 (odds 1 in ~913,000) 
Match 4 white balls: $100 (odds 1 in ~36,000) 
Match 3 white balls + Powerball: $100 (odds 1 in ~14,500) 
Match 3 white balls: $7 (odds 1 in ~580) 
Match 2 white balls + Powerball: $7 (odds 1 in ~700) 
Match 1 white ball + Powerball: $4 (odds 1 in ~92) 
Match Powerball only: $4 (odds 1 in ~38) 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.9%The Enquirer: 1.5%Confirmation Bias2.0%This article: 4.7%Cheryl Vari: 0.6%The Enquirer: 1.3%Anchoring Bias4.7%This article: 3.9%Cheryl Vari: 1.7%The Enquirer: 1.8%Availability Heuristic3.9%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.2%The Enquirer: 0.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.3%The Enquirer: 1.7%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.2%Cheryl Vari: 0.8%The Enquirer: 1.3%Optimism Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Cheryl Vari: 2.0%The Enquirer: 4.0%Negativity Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 1.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.3%The Enquirer: 1.5%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.2%The Enquirer: 1.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 1.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.6%The Enquirer: 1.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.3%The Enquirer: 1.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.4%The Enquirer: 0.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cheryl Vari: 0.0%The Enquirer: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 14.6%Cheryl Vari: 2.1%The Enquirer: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…14.6%

611 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers5.7%attributed speech576writer words
Selected voice

Jackpocket

100%flagged-word coverage
22 attributed words63% of attributed speech25% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +90.6 ptsWriter: 9.4%Jackpocket: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.