Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,404 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Materials Science results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 635 hits. Analysis detected 2,741 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,616 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (8,754 of 13,018 topics). This Materials Science is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.
Materials Science
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Materials Science attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Materials Science vs sitewide
Materials Science attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.