Topic summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video999 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Louisiana Insurance Market results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 733 hits. Analysis detected 2,670 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,996 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (10,151 of 22,261 topics). This Louisiana Insurance Market is worse (more manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Louisiana Insurance Market
Topic details
Total words: 3,996
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 18.3%18.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos