NOLA.com29%

Homeowners insurance has gotten a little cheaper, easier to come by. Is the crisis over? 57%

By Stephanie Riegel52%

8/3/2026, 2:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 215 hits. Analysis detected 1,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 999 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48% and a BS Rank of 57% (11,581 of 26,881 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the article peer group.

For the first time in several years, home sale activity across major markets in south Louisiana picked up in the first half of 2026. 
Busy real estate agents mostly attribute the uptick to one thing: a slight improvement in the state’s insurance picture. 
After homeowners saw double-digit hikes to their homeowners’ premiums following the back-to-back hurricanes of 2020 and 2021, premiums are coming back down, and nearly two dozen new carriers are licensed to do business in the state. 
Perhaps more telling, so far this year, nearly twice as many companies have filed with the Louisiana Department of Insurance for rate decreases than increases, while several other carriers have indicated they plan to hold rates steady. 
“Even just a year or two ago, many homeowners saw premiums double or even triple, forcing some to consider selling because their monthly escrow payments became unaffordable,” said real estate broker Craig Mirambelle. 
“Today many buyers are able to obtain insurance premiums much closer to pre-spike levels.” 
But there’s still a long way to go before the market could be considered healthy. 
Many of the companies newly licensed to do business  small carriers that do not have the industry's gold standard AM Best rating, aren’t actually writing policies yet or have just a tiny fraction of market share. 
Some don’t cover wind damage. 
Others are staying away from high-risk areas along the coast or in New Orleans. 
“Overall, it’s a little bit better,” Insurance Commissioner Tim Temple said in a phone interview last week. 
“We can say things are improving, but I am certainly not satisfied where we are.” 
'Doing better' 
Premiums vary widely depending on the property and location and overall, they’re continuing to increase, much as they always have, because of inflation. 
But the rate of increase is much smaller today, on average, than it has been this decade, statistics show. 
According to Temple’s office, annual premium increases are essentially flat so far this year, after increasing 4.6% last year, 6.6% in 2024 and by double digits in 2023 and 2022. 
Also significant is a drop in the number of carriers proposing rate increases, which has fallen from 50 in 2024 to 27 last year and just four so far this year. 
At the same time, nine carriers this year have filed for decreases so far this year, while three are seeking no change. 
The number of rate changes does not necessarily correlate to the number of companies doing business in the state because companies can file for multiple rate adjustments in a single year. 
“That tells you we’re doing better than we were,” Temple said. 
“There are some large carriers that were staying out of vulnerable areas for a few years,” said Ben Albright, president and CEO of the Independent Insurance Agents of Louisiana, which represents some 300 agencies. 
“They’ve started coming back. 
For new buyers, that’s a big deal.” 
“Homeowners are seeing decreases if they have a new roof or a fortified roof,” said Justin Thibodeaux, an agent with Hartwig Moss, an independent brokerage in New Orleans. 
Even more significant is the reinsurance market, which is flush with cash after recovering from the losses of 2020 and 2021. 
Reinsurers back the smaller, less-well capitalized insurance carriers that write the majority of policies in Louisiana. 
They’ve attracted major investors over the past couple of years, since they haven’t been hit with the volume of claims they experienced a few years ago. 
As of June 30, global property-catastrophe reinsurance prices were down 16% year over year, the steepest annual decline in 25 years, according to industry sources. 
“The reinsurance market is recapitalized and has been profitable,” Albright said. 
“We haven’t had the storms that we had in 2020 and 2021, so investors who stayed in the insurance market have made good money these last few years and others have said, ‘I want a piece of that.’” 
One step forward, two steps back? 
For the local real estate market, the availability of more options at better prices has helped jumpstart home sale activity, which was up 10% in the Greater New Orleans area in the first half of the year over the same period in 2025. 
In Baton Rouge and Lafayette it was up 4% and 5% respectively. 
“There are fewer restrictions on key metrics that were really onerous a couple of years ago, like age of a roof and water heaters,” said David Favret, regional vice president at Compass. 
“And there are more carriers.” 
The commercial real estate market has experienced even greater easing, according to Albright. 
Rates for owners of apartment buildings and other commercial properties have come down about 30% on average due to rate decreases in the reinsurance market. 
“Commercial coverage has gotten much better, but it also got worse much faster a few years ago,” he said. 
“It is always more volatile because it is more susceptible to changes in the reinsurance market.” 
Despite signs of hope, it is unclear how stable the state’s insurance market really is. 
If Louisiana is spared a major hit from a tropical system again this season and next, experts say the market will continue to improve. 
If it doesn’t— or if neighboring states along the Gulf Coast sustain a major hit or multiple blows, as they did in 2020 and 2021  the progress of the recent past could be all but wiped out. 
What’s more, even if the Gulf is spared a major storm, increasingly frequent weather-related disasters elsewhere could destabilize the reinsurance market with repercussions felt around the globe. 
“Whether a tropical system on the Gulf Coast, a forest fire in Europe or storms spinning up a lot more hail in the Midwest, losses continue to go up globally,” Albright said. 
"So that gets baked into the models and that drives rates." 
He added: “But the longer we can go without a storm, the better our rates look.” 
Email Stephanie Riegel at stephanie.riegel@theadvocate.com. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.6%Stephanie Riegel: 2.8%nola.com: 2.0%Confirmation Bias14.6%This article: 4.8%Stephanie Riegel: 1.7%nola.com: 0.9%Anchoring Bias4.8%This article: 12.6%Stephanie Riegel: 3.1%nola.com: 2.0%Availability Heuristic12.6%This article: 8.1%Stephanie Riegel: 1.8%nola.com: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic8.1%This article: 3.6%Stephanie Riegel: 0.3%nola.com: 0.5%Hindsight Bias3.6%This article: 2.7%Stephanie Riegel: 0.8%nola.com: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias2.7%This article: 1.2%Stephanie Riegel: 3.3%nola.com: 3.2%Framing Effect1.2%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.7%Stephanie Riegel: 0.6%nola.com: 0.4%Status Quo Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.1%nola.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.3%Stephanie Riegel: 8.0%nola.com: 3.7%Optimism Bias11.3%This article: 12.0%Stephanie Riegel: 2.9%nola.com: 1.4%Pessimism Bias12.0%This article: 15.8%Stephanie Riegel: 5.5%nola.com: 3.2%Negativity Bias15.8%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.7%nola.com: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Stephanie Riegel: 0.4%nola.com: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error1.6%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.7%nola.com: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.7%Stephanie Riegel: 1.4%nola.com: 2.4%Halo Effect0.7%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.6%Stephanie Riegel: 0.5%nola.com: 0.9%Recency Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.3%nola.com: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.2%nola.com: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.2%nola.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.7%Stephanie Riegel: 2.7%nola.com: 2.3%Appeal to Authority7.7%This article: 2.9%Stephanie Riegel: 1.4%nola.com: 0.9%False Dilemma2.9%This article: 3.8%Stephanie Riegel: 0.7%nola.com: 0.4%Slippery Slope3.8%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.2%nola.com: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.6%Stephanie Riegel: 2.1%nola.com: 2.2%Hasty Generalization7.6%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.2%nola.com: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 1.6%nola.com: 2.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 1.1%Stephanie Riegel: 0.8%nola.com: 0.4%Begging the Question1.1%This article: 21.5%Stephanie Riegel: 3.0%nola.com: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)21.5%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.4%Stephanie Riegel: 0.2%nola.com: 0.4%Burden of Proof2.4%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 5.8%Stephanie Riegel: 0.5%nola.com: 0.3%Composition/Division5.8%This article: 6.1%Stephanie Riegel: 2.8%nola.com: 1.8%Anecdotal6.1%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.1%nola.com: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.1%Stephanie Riegel: 0.6%nola.com: 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.1%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.4%nola.com: 1.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 3.3%Stephanie Riegel: 0.4%nola.com: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection3.3%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 1.1%nola.com: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.2%nola.com: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

999 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers34%attributed speech656writer words
Selected voice

Craig Mirambelle

100%flagged-word coverage
47 attributed words14% of attributed speech87% writer coverage
0%37.5%75.0%Quote-first Misdirection+70.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Craig Mirambelle: 70.2%70.2%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.