Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video563 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Nuclear Negotiations results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Framing Effect, and False Dilemma, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 365 hits. Analysis detected 1,928 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,689 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 66% (3,892 of 11,454 topics). This Iran Nuclear Negotiations is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Iran Nuclear Negotiations
Topic details
Total words: 1,689
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Iran Nuclear Negotiations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Iran Nuclear Negotiations vs All Other Publications
Iran Nuclear Negotiations attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos