Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video563 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Nuclear Negotiations results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Framing Effect, and False Dilemma, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 365 hits. Analysis detected 1,928 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,689 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 66% (3,892 of 11,454 topics). This Iran Nuclear Negotiations is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Iran Nuclear Negotiations
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Iran Nuclear Negotiations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Iran Nuclear Negotiations vs All Other Publications
Iran Nuclear Negotiations attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.