Topic summary

⁠70%1 analyzed article/video350 analyzed words

BS Summary: These International Monetary Fund results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, False Dilemma, and Optimism Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 990 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,050 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (6,343 of 13,023 topics). This International Monetary Fund is worse (more manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.

International Monetary Fund

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠52%	International Monetary Fund (selected)	4%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 1,050

Article count: 1

Authors

Alex Beehler

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

International Monetary Fund attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

International Monetary Fund vs sitewide

International Monetary Fund attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

An International Monetary Fund Currency to Rival the Dollar? Why Special Drawing Rights Can’t Play That Role (Development Policy Analysis)⁠^55%

The Daily Caller⁠^66%By Alex Beehler⁠^37%7/7/2009, 4:00:00 AM