Topic summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video804 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Industry Analysis results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 324 hits. Analysis detected 2,235 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (13,345 of 24,545 topics). This Industry Analysis is better (less manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Industry Analysis
Topic details
Total words: 3,216
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.1%10.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos