Guest opinion: Manufacturing’s comeback depends on Wisconsin’s workforce 59%

By Scott Mayer69%

7/31/2026, 7:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 152 hits. Analysis detected 1,297 faulty-reasoning hits from 804 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.2% and a BS Rank of 59% (12,649 of 30,584 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the article peer group.

For years, the story surrounding American manufacturing was in decline. 
We heard about factories closing, jobs moving overseas, and communities struggling to replace the industries that once defined them. 
That narrative is beginning to change. 
As executive chairman of QPS Employment Group, an employee-owned staffing and recruiting firm headquartered in Brookfield, I speak every day with manufacturers across Wisconsin and the Midwest. 
Unlike economists analyzing data after the fact, our recruiters hear what’s happening in real time. 
We know when production lines are speeding up, when companies are adding shifts, and when employers begin asking for more workers. 
Today, the message we’re hearing is encouraging. 
Manufacturing is making a comeback. 
A recent Institute for Supply Management report backs up what employers have been telling us for months: U.S. manufacturing has expanded for six consecutive months. 
While growth moderated slightly in June, factories continue to report healthy levels of new orders and steady production, signs that demand remains resilient despite ongoing economic uncertainty. 
That’s especially good news for Wisconsin. 
Manufacturing has long defined our identity. 
From precision machining and industrial equipment to food processing and paper products, our state has built its reputation on making things. 
These industries don’t just create products; they create careers, support local businesses and strengthen communities. 
A busy factory means more truck drivers delivering materials, warehouse employees moving inventory, and electricians, maintenance technicians, welders, engineers, accountants and administrative professionals supporting operations. 
The ripple effect extends well beyond the factory floor. 
Several factors are contributing to today’s momentum. 
Companies continue investing in domestic production. 
Businesses learned from recent supply chain disruptions and increasingly recognize the value of producing more goods closer to home. 
Investments in artificial intelligence, data centers and advanced technologies are fueling demand for equipment, components and industrial products that American manufacturers are well positioned to produce. 
None of this means manufacturing is easy. 
Many employers still face rising material costs, interest rate uncertainty and rapidly changing global markets. 
Labor shortages also remain one of the biggest obstacles to continued growth. 
One of today’s biggest challenges is that manufacturing demand continues to grow even as companies struggle to find enough workers. 
That challenge won’t solve itself. 
For decades, we’ve encouraged nearly every young person to pursue a four-year degree while overlooking opportunities in skilled trades and manufacturing. 
The reality looks very different today. 
Modern manufacturing is clean, technology-driven and increasingly sophisticated. 
Employees operate advanced robotics, program automated equipment, analyze production data and work with technologies transforming the industry. 
Many of these careers offer competitive wages, excellent benefits and long-term stability without requiring massive student loan debt. 
That is a message we need to do a better job of sharing with students, parents and educators alike. 
Employers share that responsibility. 
Successful manufacturers aren’t waiting for talent to walk through the door. 
They’re investing in training, partnering with technical colleges, offering apprenticeships, improving workplace culture and creating career paths that encourage employees to stay. 
Workforce development has become a competitive advantage. 
Wisconsin has long benefited from its work ethic and entrepreneurial spirit. 
Those strengths remain just as valuable today as they were generations ago. 
Sustaining this manufacturing resurgence will require continued investment not only in equipment and facilities but also in people. 
That means supporting technical education, expanding apprenticeship opportunities, helping veterans transition into manufacturing careers and creating workforce solutions that allow businesses to fill critical positions. 
Manufacturers remain optimistic. 
After several years marked by supply chain disruptions, inflation and economic uncertainty, many employers are once again planning for growth rather than simply reacting to challenges. 
That shift in mindset matters because confidence often drives investment, hiring and long-term expansion. 
We see that confidence firsthand. 
No one can predict exactly what the economy will look like a year from now. 
Manufacturing has always been cyclical, and challenges will inevitably emerge along the way. 
Still, the trajectory is moving in the right direction. 
Wisconsin has an opportunity to build on that momentum by continuing to support the industries that have long been the backbone of our economy. 
If we invest in our workforce, embrace innovation and ensure manufacturers have access to the talent they need, this comeback can become sustainable. 
It can become the foundation for the next generation of American manufacturing. 
That’s something worth building. 
Scott Mayer is the founder and executive chairman of QPS Employment Group, an employee-owned staffing and recruiting firm headquartered in Brookfield, Wisconsin. 
Guest commentaries reflect the views of their authors and are independent of the nonpartisan, in-depth reporting produced by Wisconsin Watch’s newsroom staff. 
Want to join the Wisconversion? 
See our guidelines for submissions . 
Guest opinion: Manufacturing’s comeback depends on Wisconsin’s workforce is a post from Wisconsin Watch , a non-profit investigative news site covering Wisconsin since 2009. 
Please consider making a contribution to support our journalism. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.4%Scott Mayer: 6.2%Wisconsin Watch: 1.6%Confirmation Bias13.4%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Scott Mayer: 3.5%Wisconsin Watch: 1.8%Availability Heuristic8.5%This article: 4.2%Scott Mayer: 1.1%Wisconsin Watch: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic4.2%This article: 1.5%Scott Mayer: 0.4%Wisconsin Watch: 0.2%Hindsight Bias1.5%This article: 3.6%Scott Mayer: 2.8%Wisconsin Watch: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias3.6%This article: 5.2%Scott Mayer: 1.8%Wisconsin Watch: 3.1%Framing Effect5.2%This article: 1.1%Scott Mayer: 0.3%Wisconsin Watch: 0.9%Loss Aversion1.1%This article: 7.7%Scott Mayer: 2.5%Wisconsin Watch: 0.6%Status Quo Bias7.7%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 18.9%Scott Mayer: 10.1%Wisconsin Watch: 2.3%Optimism Bias18.9%This article: 0.6%Scott Mayer: 0.2%Wisconsin Watch: 1.1%Pessimism Bias0.6%This article: 6.1%Scott Mayer: 1.5%Wisconsin Watch: 3.8%Negativity Bias6.1%This article: 5.3%Scott Mayer: 1.3%Wisconsin Watch: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 2.5%Wisconsin Watch: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Scott Mayer: 3.3%Wisconsin Watch: 1.0%Halo Effect8.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.9%Scott Mayer: 0.5%Wisconsin Watch: 0.8%Recency Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.9%Scott Mayer: 0.2%Wisconsin Watch: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.9%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.3%Scott Mayer: 5.4%Wisconsin Watch: 2.1%Appeal to Authority8.3%This article: 5.3%Scott Mayer: 1.8%Wisconsin Watch: 0.9%False Dilemma5.3%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 2.7%Scott Mayer: 0.7%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Circular Reasoning2.7%This article: 11.8%Scott Mayer: 4.4%Wisconsin Watch: 1.8%Hasty Generalization11.8%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 1.6%Scott Mayer: 1.0%Wisconsin Watch: 2.8%Appeal to Emotion1.6%This article: 0.7%Scott Mayer: 0.2%Wisconsin Watch: 0.4%Begging the Question0.7%This article: 12.7%Scott Mayer: 3.2%Wisconsin Watch: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.7%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.7%Scott Mayer: 0.9%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Composition/Division3.7%This article: 8.7%Scott Mayer: 2.3%Wisconsin Watch: 2.1%Anecdotal8.7%This article: 1.0%Scott Mayer: 0.2%Wisconsin Watch: 0.0%No True Scotsman1.0%This article: 6.1%Scott Mayer: 1.5%Wisconsin Watch: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.1%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.6%Scott Mayer: 0.7%Wisconsin Watch: 0.4%Unattributed Quote2.6%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 1.0%Scott Mayer: 1.1%Wisconsin Watch: 1.0%Biased Writer Voice1.0%This article: 5.5%Scott Mayer: 6.9%Wisconsin Watch: 1.2%Indoctrination5.5%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Mayer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Scott Mayer: 1.2%Wisconsin Watch: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.5%

804 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers15%attributed speech684writer words
Selected voice

QPS Employment Group

100%flagged-word coverage
27 attributed words23% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Indoctrination-6.4 ptsWriter: 6.4%QPS Employment Group: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-3.1 ptsWriter: 3.1%QPS Employment Group: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.9 ptsWriter: 2.9%QPS Employment Group: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-1.2 ptsWriter: 1.2%QPS Employment Group: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.