Topic summary
⁠13%1 analyzed article/video634 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Inclusion results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Hasty Generalization, and In-Group Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 532 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,902 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (12,729 of 24,424 topics). This Inclusion is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Inclusion
Topic details
Total words: 1,902
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.4%6.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.0%4.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos