Topic summary
5%1 analyzed article/video118 analyzed words
BS Summary: These High Court results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 396 faulty-reasoning hits from 354 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of 89% (1,833 of 15,511 topics). This High Court is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
High Court
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 354
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
High Court attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
High Court vs sitewide
High Court attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos