Author summary
7%1 analyzed article/video118 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Forbes results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 396 faulty-reasoning hits from 354 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of 92% (503 of 6,303 authors). This Nick Forbes is worse (more manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group.
Nick Forbes
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nick Forbes attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nick Forbes vs sitewide
Nick Forbes attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.