Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Existential Risk From AI results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 874 hits. Analysis detected 7,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 15,269 topics). This Existential Risk From AI is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Existential Risk From AI
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 0%Alameda County1%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
ā 0%Existential Risk From AI (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 9,660
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Existential Risk From AI attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Existential Risk From AI vs sitewide
Existential Risk From AI attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos