Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Endangered Species Act Reform results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 2.5% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 423 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,876 topics). This Endangered Species Act Reform is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Endangered Species Act Reform
Topic details
Total words: 4,196
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Endangered Species Act Reform attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Endangered Species Act Reform vs sitewide
Endangered Species Act Reform attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos