Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nick Mott results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 2.5% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 423 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,778 authors). This Nick Mott is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Nick Mott
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠1%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Nick Mott (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 4,196
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nick Mott attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nick Mott vs sitewide
Nick Mott attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos