Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video1,582 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Couples results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 217 hits. Analysis detected 2,055 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,369 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ā 26% (9,728 of 13,018 topics). This Couples is better (less manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Couples
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Self-Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Self Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Oakland Culture1%
ā 0%Dive Bars1%
ā 26%Couples (selected)3%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,369
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Couples attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Couples vs sitewide
Couples attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos