Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chesterfield County Elections results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 2.3% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 124 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,346 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 21,647 topics). This Chesterfield County Elections is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Chesterfield County Elections
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,346
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos