Author summary
⁠14%4 analyzed articles/videos1,418 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eleanor Shaw results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 313 hits. Analysis detected 2,746 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,980 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (7,642 of 8,355 authors). This Eleanor Shaw is better (less manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group.
Eleanor Shaw
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠9%Eleanor Shaw (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,980
Article count: 4
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Eleanor Shaw attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Eleanor Shaw vs sitewide
Eleanor Shaw attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos