Topic summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video487 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Car Modifications results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 246 hits. Analysis detected 1,048 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,948 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (13,123 of 22,261 topics). This Car Modifications is better (less manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group.
Car Modifications
Topic details
Total words: 1,948
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.6%12.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos