Topic summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video268 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amd results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 27% saturation with 289 hits. Analysis detected 1,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,072 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (3,230 of 23,742 topics). This Amd is worse (more manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group.
Amd
Topic details
Total words: 1,072
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510086.4% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 27.0%27.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.3%9.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.7%8.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Topic 27.0%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.7%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos