Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Amazon Hq2 results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 2.7% saturation with 90 hits . Analysis detected 493 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,303 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 22,215 topics). This Amazon Hq2 is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Amazon Hq2
Topic details
Total words: 3,303
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst