Publication summary
⁠66%4 analyzed articles/videos1,871 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ARLnow results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 455 hits. Analysis detected 3,893 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,012 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (123 of 323 publications). This ARLnow is worse (more manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
ARLnow
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%FactCheck.org1%
⁠1%@politifact1%
⁠1%Berkeleyside2%
⁠1%The Colorado Sun2%
⁠2%Houston Chronicle2%
⁠63%ARLnow (selected)3%
⁠99%KESQ9%
⁠100%The White House9%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events26%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Total words: 5,012
Article count: 4
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
ARLnow attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
ARLnow vs sitewide
ARLnow attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos