Speaker summary
⁠26%1 analyzed article/video195 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Angus results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 18.832 hits. Analysis detected 30.843 faulty-reasoning hits from 195 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (17,710 of 18,945 speakers). This William Angus is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
William Angus
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠7%William Angus (selected)8%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 195
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos